[PATCH -next] sched/numa: document CLONE_VM behavior

From: Davidlohr Bueso
Date: Wed Jan 15 2014 - 14:01:59 EST


From: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@xxxxxx>

The changelog for Rik's "sched/numa: Stay on the same node if CLONE_VM" patch
serves well documented in the code.

Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@xxxxxx>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 7f45fd5..a2d690c 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -1743,10 +1743,16 @@ static void __sched_fork(unsigned long clone_flags, struct task_struct *p)

#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
if (p->mm && atomic_read(&p->mm->mm_users) == 1) {
- p->mm->numa_next_scan = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_delay);
p->mm->numa_scan_seq = 0;
+ p->mm->numa_next_scan = jiffies +
+ msecs_to_jiffies(sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_delay);
}

+ /*
+ * A newly spawned thread should stay on the same NUMA node as its
+ * parent. This prevents processes from being "torn" across multiple
+ * NUMA nodes every time they spawn a new thread.
+ */
if (clone_flags & CLONE_VM)
p->numa_preferred_nid = current->numa_preferred_nid;
else
--
1.8.1.4



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/