Re: perf probe: Build error with missing libraries

[Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo]

Em Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 10:58:58AM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> Hi Arnaldo,
> 
> On Tue, 14 Jan 2014 10:09:07 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 10:41:37AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
> >> (2014/01/14 3:14), Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> >> > Jiri, this is something else for the give-me-more-ponies list for
> >> > tests/make: build it on freshly provisioned systems with multiple mixes
> >> > of devel packages installed ;-)
> >  
> >> I think we can change makefile to get some combinations of config options
> >> when building perf tools.
> >
> > This is what:
> >
> >  make -C tools/perf -f tests/make
> >
> > does, and we use it already, many config combos are tested, but that
> > kinda expects that all optional devel libs be installed.
> 
> I've been thinking that the above should look like below.
> 
>   make build-test (-C tools/perf)
> 
> 
> Maybe something like this?

Haven't tested, but I think it is worth to make this a shortcut, care to
test (if not yet) and resubmit with proper S-O-B, etc?

- Arnaldo
 
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/Makefile b/tools/perf/Makefile
> index eefb9fb0c02f..e110c2a2ade1 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/perf/Makefile
> @@ -75,6 +75,12 @@ clean:
>  	$(make)
>  
>  #
> +# The build-test target is not really parallel, don't print the jobs info:
> +#
> +build-test:
> +	@$(MAKE) -f tests/make --no-print-directory
> +
> +#
>  # All other targets get passed through:
>  #
>  %:
> 
> -- 
> Thanks,
> Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/