On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 05:25:55PM +0800, Michael wang wrote:diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 0326c06..bf4a6ed 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -3464,6 +3464,10 @@ int sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p, int
policy,
.sched_policy = policy,
.sched_priority = param->sched_priority
};
+
+ if (fair_policy(policy))
+ attr.sched_nice = PRIO_TO_NICE(attr.sched_priority);
+
return __sched_setscheduler(p, &attr, true);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sched_setscheduler);
@@ -3494,6 +3498,10 @@ int sched_setscheduler_nocheck(struct task_struct
*p, int policy,
.sched_policy = policy,
.sched_priority = param->sched_priority
};
+
+ if (fair_policy(policy))
+ attr.sched_nice = PRIO_TO_NICE(attr.sched_priority);
+
return __sched_setscheduler(p, &attr, false);
}
That seems wrong; the manpage confirms, from sched_setscheduler(2):
For processes scheduled under one of the normal scheduling
policies (SCHED_OTHER, SCHED_IDLE, SCHED_BATCH), sched_priority
is not used in scheduling decisions (it must be speciâ fied as
0).
That said; we should probably preserve the nice value, which with the
current code we reset to 0.
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 0326c06953eb..f3abbb7dae62 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -3462,7 +3462,8 @@ int sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p, int policy,
{
struct sched_attr attr = {
.sched_policy = policy,
- .sched_priority = param->sched_priority
+ .sched_priority = param->sched_priority,
+ .sched_nice = PRIO_TO_NICE(p->static_prio),
};
return __sched_setscheduler(p, &attr, true);
}
@@ -3492,7 +3493,8 @@ int sched_setscheduler_nocheck(struct task_struct *p, int policy,
{
struct sched_attr attr = {
.sched_policy = policy,
- .sched_priority = param->sched_priority
+ .sched_priority = param->sched_priority,
+ .sched_nice = PRIO_TO_NICE(p->static_prio),
};
return __sched_setscheduler(p, &attr, false);
}