Re: [PATCH 1/3] mfd: MAX6650/6651 support

[Linus Walleij]

On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, 09 Jan 2014, Laszlo Papp wrote:
>
>> >> +int max6651_read_reg(struct i2c_client *i2c, u8 reg, u8 *dest)
>> >> +{
>> >
>> > Probably best to use Regmap instead.
>> >
>> > regmap_i2c_read()
>>
>> >> +int max6651_write_reg(struct i2c_client *i2c, u8 reg, u8 value)
>> >> +{
>> >> +    struct max6651_dev *max6651 = i2c_get_clientdata(i2c);
>> >> +    int ret;
>> >
>> > Same here.
>> >
>> > regmap_i2c_write()
>>
>> Hmm, but what Linus linked is using regmap_read/write(...) instead of
>> regmap_i2c_read/write(...).
>>
>> I thought I would need to be using the former. Perhaps, I
>> misunderstand something?
>>
>> I do not even find the aforementioend functions used by drivers based
>> on this LXR result:
>> http://lxr.free-electrons.com/ident?i=regmap_i2c_write
>
> Linus is in a better position to know, use his suggestion.

Just use regmap_read/write to abstract things and hide the
underlying marshalling in regmap.

regmap_i2c_write is some regmap-internal thing.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/