Re: [Question] Should we make the primary interrupt handlerconfigurable for regmap_add_irq_chip()?

[Mark Brown]

On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 12:15:21PM +0800, Yi Zhang wrote:

> I met a scenario:
> As soon as the interrupt is triggered, a wakelock is needed to be held
> until the threaded handler finishes,
> I think we may hold it in the primary interrupt handler, but now it's
> NULL by default;

This sounds like something we should just support in the core, though to
be honest I'd expect the interrupt core to hold a wakelock itself during
interrupt processing.  If we're doing it in regmap then allowing the
caller to set a wakelock to hold seems better than making them all write
the code to take and release it.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature