Re: [PATCH RFC] reciprocal_divide: correction/update of thealgorithm

[Eric Dumazet]

On Tue, 2014-01-14 at 14:22 -0500, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:

> I disagree with the statement that current CPU's have reasonably fast
> dividers.  A lot of embedded processors and many low-end x86 CPU's do
> not in-fact have any hardware divider, and usually provide it using
> microcode based emulation if they provide it at all.  The AMD Jaguar
> micro-architecture in particular comes to mind, it uses an iterative
> division algorithm provided by the microcode that only produces 2 bits
> of quotient per cycle, even in the best case (2 8-bit integers and an
> integral 8-bit quotient) this still takes 4 cycles, which is twice as
> slow as any other math operation on the same processor.

I doubt you run any BPF filter with a divide instruction in it on these
platform.

Get real, do not over optimize things where it does not matter.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/