Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the net-next tree

[David Miller]

From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 16:44:20 +1100

> On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 21:19:46 -0800 (PST) David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 20:51:43 -0800
>> 
>> > Is there a sensible way we can fix this in either net-next or tip?
>> 
>> I think if I sort the files in net-next the problem will go away,
>> if someone can confirm this I'll do it.
> 
> I have attached 2 patches: one for net-next and one for tip/auto-latest
> (but should be applicable in the appropriate topic branch).  If both are
> applied to their respect trees, then I get no conflict when merging the
> two trees.

Net patch applied, thanks Stephen.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/