Re: net/mlx4_core: clean up two functions

[Amir Vadai]

On 13/01/14 11:13 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 14:00:22 +0100
> 
> > 0) These two patches are very similar. They both clean up a function to
> > help GCC understand the codeflow. Both help silence a warning.
> > 
> > 1) Compile tested only (on 32 bits x86). I do not have this hardware.
> > 
> > 2) Please note that there's no MAINTAINERS entry for mlx4_core. (Neither
> > is there an entry for the MLX4 IB driver.) Shouldn't it be added? 
> 
> These patches have been rotting for a week.  I know the mlx4 folks
> said the SRIOV guy inside Mellanox will look at it, but this is taking
> way too long.
> 
> This is absolutely unreasonable from Paul's perspective to have to wait
> this long for a review of these relatively simple patches.

You're absolutely right.
And yes, jack is very busy.
We will have a reply ready tomorrow morning.

Amir


> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/