[PATCH 3.11 086/208] drm/radeon: fix render backend setup for SI and CIK

From: Luis Henriques
Date: Mon Jan 13 2014 - 11:39:38 EST


3.11.10.3 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: =?UTF-8?q?Marek=20Ol=C5=A1=C3=A1k?= <marek.olsak@xxxxxxx>

commit 9fadb352ed73edd7801a280b552d33a6040c8721 upstream.

Only the render backends of the first shader engine were enabled. The others
were erroneously disabled. Enabling the other render backends improves
performance a lot.

Unigine Sanctuary on Bonaire:
Before: 15 fps
After: 90 fps

Judging from the fan noise, the GPU was also underclocked when the other
render backends were disabled, resulting in horrible performance. The fan is
a lot noisy under load now.

Signed-off-by: Marek OlÅÃk <marek.olsak@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@xxxxxxx>
[ luis: backported to 3.11: adjusted context ]
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/cik.c | 10 +++++-----
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/si.c | 10 +++++-----
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/cik.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/cik.c
index e4182a6..6796c9d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/cik.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/cik.c
@@ -1768,7 +1768,7 @@ static u32 cik_create_bitmask(u32 bit_width)
* Returns the disabled RB bitmask.
*/
static u32 cik_get_rb_disabled(struct radeon_device *rdev,
- u32 max_rb_num, u32 se_num,
+ u32 max_rb_num_per_se,
u32 sh_per_se)
{
u32 data, mask;
@@ -1782,7 +1782,7 @@ static u32 cik_get_rb_disabled(struct radeon_device *rdev,

data >>= BACKEND_DISABLE_SHIFT;

- mask = cik_create_bitmask(max_rb_num / se_num / sh_per_se);
+ mask = cik_create_bitmask(max_rb_num_per_se / sh_per_se);

return data & mask;
}
@@ -1799,7 +1799,7 @@ static u32 cik_get_rb_disabled(struct radeon_device *rdev,
*/
static void cik_setup_rb(struct radeon_device *rdev,
u32 se_num, u32 sh_per_se,
- u32 max_rb_num)
+ u32 max_rb_num_per_se)
{
int i, j;
u32 data, mask;
@@ -1809,14 +1809,14 @@ static void cik_setup_rb(struct radeon_device *rdev,
for (i = 0; i < se_num; i++) {
for (j = 0; j < sh_per_se; j++) {
cik_select_se_sh(rdev, i, j);
- data = cik_get_rb_disabled(rdev, max_rb_num, se_num, sh_per_se);
+ data = cik_get_rb_disabled(rdev, max_rb_num_per_se, sh_per_se);
disabled_rbs |= data << ((i * sh_per_se + j) * CIK_RB_BITMAP_WIDTH_PER_SH);
}
}
cik_select_se_sh(rdev, 0xffffffff, 0xffffffff);

mask = 1;
- for (i = 0; i < max_rb_num; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < max_rb_num_per_se * se_num; i++) {
if (!(disabled_rbs & mask))
enabled_rbs |= mask;
mask <<= 1;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/si.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/si.c
index a69180c..0da5449 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/si.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/si.c
@@ -2804,7 +2804,7 @@ static void si_setup_spi(struct radeon_device *rdev,
}

static u32 si_get_rb_disabled(struct radeon_device *rdev,
- u32 max_rb_num, u32 se_num,
+ u32 max_rb_num_per_se,
u32 sh_per_se)
{
u32 data, mask;
@@ -2818,14 +2818,14 @@ static u32 si_get_rb_disabled(struct radeon_device *rdev,

data >>= BACKEND_DISABLE_SHIFT;

- mask = si_create_bitmask(max_rb_num / se_num / sh_per_se);
+ mask = si_create_bitmask(max_rb_num_per_se / sh_per_se);

return data & mask;
}

static void si_setup_rb(struct radeon_device *rdev,
u32 se_num, u32 sh_per_se,
- u32 max_rb_num)
+ u32 max_rb_num_per_se)
{
int i, j;
u32 data, mask;
@@ -2835,14 +2835,14 @@ static void si_setup_rb(struct radeon_device *rdev,
for (i = 0; i < se_num; i++) {
for (j = 0; j < sh_per_se; j++) {
si_select_se_sh(rdev, i, j);
- data = si_get_rb_disabled(rdev, max_rb_num, se_num, sh_per_se);
+ data = si_get_rb_disabled(rdev, max_rb_num_per_se, sh_per_se);
disabled_rbs |= data << ((i * sh_per_se + j) * TAHITI_RB_BITMAP_WIDTH_PER_SH);
}
}
si_select_se_sh(rdev, 0xffffffff, 0xffffffff);

mask = 1;
- for (i = 0; i < max_rb_num; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < max_rb_num_per_se * se_num; i++) {
if (!(disabled_rbs & mask))
enabled_rbs |= mask;
mask <<= 1;
--
1.8.3.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/