[PATCH 3.11 141/208] ext4: fix bigalloc regression

[Luis Henriques]

3.11.10.3 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Eric Whitney <enwlinux@xxxxxxxxx>

commit d0abafac8c9162f39c4f6b2f8141b772a09b3770 upstream.

Commit f5a44db5d2 introduced a regression on filesystems created with
the bigalloc feature (cluster size > blocksize).  It causes xfstests
generic/006 and /013 to fail with an unexpected JBD2 failure and
transaction abort that leaves the test file system in a read only state.
Other xfstests run on bigalloc file systems are likely to fail as well.

The cause is the accidental use of a cluster mask where a cluster
offset was needed in ext4_ext_map_blocks().

Signed-off-by: Eric Whitney <enwlinux@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/ext4/extents.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c
index f8d6668..878338f 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
@@ -4145,7 +4145,7 @@ int ext4_ext_map_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
 	 */
 	map->m_flags &= ~EXT4_MAP_FROM_CLUSTER;
 	newex.ee_block = cpu_to_le32(map->m_lblk);
-	cluster_offset = EXT4_LBLK_CMASK(sbi, map->m_lblk);
+	cluster_offset = EXT4_LBLK_COFF(sbi, map->m_lblk);
 
 	/*
 	 * If we are doing bigalloc, check to see if the extent returned
-- 
1.8.3.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/