Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] cpufreq: imx6q-cpufreq driver depends onSOC_IMX6Q/SOC_IMX6SL

[Shawn Guo]

On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 06:39:52PM -0800, John Tobias wrote:
> The ARCH_HAS_CPUFREQ, HAVE_IMX_ANATOP and PM_OPP are moved up to ARCH_MCX.
> The driver should show if the SOC_IMX6Q and/or SOC_IMX6SL is/are selected.
> 
> Signed-off-by: John Tobias <john.tobias.ph@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
> index 3ba5dcc..230c663 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
> @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ config ARM_HIGHBANK_CPUFREQ
>  
>  config ARM_IMX6Q_CPUFREQ
>  	tristate "Freescale i.MX6 cpufreq support"
> -	depends on ARCH_MXC
> +	depends on SOC_IMX6Q || SOC_IMX6SL

No.  We do not want to touch this line where there is another IMX6xx can
reuse the driver.  Depending on ARCH_MXC is good enough, since we
already have the symbol prompt and help text to tell the targets that
the driver supports.

Shawn

>  	depends on REGULATOR_ANATOP
>  	help
>  	  This adds cpufreq driver support for Freescale i.MX6 series SoCs.
> -- 
> 1.8.3.2
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/