Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] rcu_dereference_check_fdtable fix/cleanups

[Paul E. McKenney]

On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 07:19:08PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 01/10, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 04:34:59PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > >
> > > doesn't this look much simpler than adding the "bool unshared" argument
> > > and changing the callers?
> >
> > I might be being too paranoid, but my concern with using rcu_lock_acquire()
> > and rcu_lock_release()
> 
> And I agree, I no longer suggest to use rcu_lock_acquire/release.
> 
> It seems that you misunderstood me, let me send v2 for review.

Ah, I did misunderstand you.  For both:

Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

							Thanx, Paul

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/