[PATCH v2 0/2] rcu_dereference_check_fdtable fix/cleanups

[Oleg Nesterov]

On 01/10, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 04:34:59PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > doesn't this look much simpler than adding the "bool unshared" argument
> > and changing the callers?
>
> I might be being too paranoid, but my concern with using rcu_lock_acquire()
> and rcu_lock_release()

And I agree, I no longer suggest to use rcu_lock_acquire/release.

It seems that you misunderstood me, let me send v2 for review.

Oleg.

 fs/file.c                |   30 +++++++++++-------------------
 include/linux/fdtable.h  |   35 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 include/linux/rcupdate.h |    2 --
 kernel/rcu/update.c      |   11 -----------
 4 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/