linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the btrfs tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi Jens,

Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got a conflict in
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c between commit 1c94f854cbb6 ("btrfs: remove unused
variables from extent_io.c") from the btrfs tree and commit 2c30c71bd653
("block: Convert various code to bio_for_each_segment()") from the block
tree.

I fixed it up (thanks Chris for the heads up and resolution - see below)
and can carry the fix as necessary (no action is required).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

diff --cc fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
index fbe501d3bd01,bcb6f1b780d6..000000000000
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
@@@ -2375,12 -2332,15 +2375,13 @@@ int end_extent_writepage(struct page *p
   */
  static void end_bio_extent_writepage(struct bio *bio, int err)
  {
- 	struct bio_vec *bvec = bio->bi_io_vec + bio->bi_vcnt - 1;
+ 	struct bio_vec *bvec;
 -	struct extent_io_tree *tree;
  	u64 start;
  	u64 end;
+ 	int i;
  
- 	do {
+ 	bio_for_each_segment_all(bvec, bio, i) {
  		struct page *page = bvec->bv_page;
 -		tree = &BTRFS_I(page->mapping->host)->io_tree;
  
  		/* We always issue full-page reads, but if some block
  		 * in a page fails to read, blk_update_request() will

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature