[PATCH] swiotlb: Don't DoS us with 'swiotlb buffer is full'

[Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk]

There is no need for that so lets use ratelimiting.
Also add some extra information to be helpful.

CC: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 lib/swiotlb.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/lib/swiotlb.c b/lib/swiotlb.c
index e4399fa..7c97bd2 100644
--- a/lib/swiotlb.c
+++ b/lib/swiotlb.c
@@ -505,7 +505,8 @@ phys_addr_t swiotlb_tbl_map_single(struct device *hwdev,
 
 not_found:
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&io_tlb_lock, flags);
-	dev_warn(hwdev, "swiotlb buffer is full\n");
+	if (printk_ratelimit())
+		dev_warn(hwdev, "swiotlb buffer is full (sz: %ld bytes)\n", size);
 	return SWIOTLB_MAP_ERROR;
 found:
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&io_tlb_lock, flags);
-- 
1.8.3.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/