Re: Re: [PATCH] perf probe: Improve error message when functionnot found

From: Masami Hiramatsu
Date: Fri Dec 27 2013 - 02:35:00 EST


(2013/12/26 22:43), David Ahern wrote:
> Masami:
>
> If you do not have any problems with this version please Ack so Arnaldo
> will pick it up.

David, as we talked about that before;

(2013/12/04 10:23), Masami Hiramatsu wrote:> (2013/12/04 0:15), David Ahern wrote:
>> On 12/2/13, 10:12 PM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>>>> That needs to be explicitly stated in the error message -- only global
>>>> symbols may be given.
>>>
>>> Ah, I see. In that case, I think the "variable" is not a correct word,
>>> the "symbol" is better, because perf probe can take tracing variable
>>> arguments after the trace point definition. :)
>>
>> Right, variable is not the correct word. So how about this:
>>
>> "Failed to find requested symbol in %s. Is it a global symbol?"
>
> Yeah, that's good for me now :)

But your patch, still using the "variable"....

>> + pr_err("Failed to find requested symbol in %s. Is it a global variable?\n",
>> + name);

Thus, I can't give Ack for this.

Anyway, I'd like to rewrite this part since it is too limited,
after my 2 weeks off.

Thank you,

> On 12/20/13, 1:04 PM, David Ahern wrote:
>> When requesting a function from a userspace library the error message to
>> the user is less than helpful. e.g.,
>>
>> perf probe -x /lib64/libpthread-2.14.90.so -a 'lock_full=__pthread_mutex_lock_full'
>> no symbols found in /lib64/libpthread-2.14.90.so, maybe install a debug package?
>> Failed to load map.
>> Error: Failed to add events. (-22)
>>
>> yet the symbol really does exist but is a local symbol which is filtered:
>>
>> nm /lib64/libpthread-2.14.90.so | grep __pthread_mutex_lock_full
>> 0000000000005700 t __pthread_mutex_lock_full
>>
>> With this patch:
>> perf probe -x /lib64/libpthread-2.14.90.so -a 'lock_full=__pthread_mutex_lock_full'
>>
>> no symbols found in /lib64/libpthread-2.14.90.so, maybe install a debug package?
>> Failed to find function in /lib64/libpthread-2.14.90.so. Perhaps it is a local variable?
>> Error: Failed to add events. (-22)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsahern@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c b/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c
>> index 9c6989ca2bea..2eac49096840 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c
>> @@ -2309,7 +2309,8 @@ static int convert_name_to_addr(struct perf_probe_event *pev, const char *exec)
>> }
>> available_func_filter = strfilter__new(function, NULL);
>> if (map__load(map, filter_available_functions)) {
>> - pr_err("Failed to load map.\n");
>> + pr_err("Failed to find requested symbol in %s. Is it a global variable?\n",
>> + name);
>> goto out;
>> }

--
Masami HIRAMATSU
IT Management Research Dept. Linux Technology Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@xxxxxxxxxxx


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/