Re: No freezing of kernel threads (was: Re: [GIT PULL] libata fixes for v3.13-rc5)

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Thursday, December 26, 2013 02:01:20 PM Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hey,
> 
> On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 01:42:29PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> > In the case of hibernation, it's not so simple.  We do need to perform 
> > I/O, in order to save the memory image.  But we also need to avoid 
> > unnecessary I/O, in order to keep the on-disk data consistent with the 
> > data in the memory image.  You probably can't accomplish this at the 
> > device driver or subsystem level.
> 
> That was what I assumed too but Rafael tells me it has nothing to do
> with hibernation.

It doesn't prevent on-disk data corruption from happening in case of a failing
hibernation.  In case of a successful hibernation it is key to keep on-disk
data in sync with the contents of the image, but relying on the freezing
for that is rather not a winning strategy, so to speak.  It would be better
to freeze filesystems instead (which has been discussed in another thread
recently).

Thanks,
Rafael

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/