Re: [RFC PATCH 00/14] Support timezone of ACPI TAD and EFI TIME

[H. Peter Anvin]

On 12/20/2013 02:53 AM, Thomas Renninger wrote:
> On Thursday, December 19, 2013 08:22:08 PM H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> On 12/19/2013 08:05 PM, joeyli wrote:
>>> Then that means the priority of PNP0B0x is higher then "CMOS RTC Not
>>> Present" flag. ACPI spec doesn't have clear definition on this.
>>
>> According to the Microsoft requirements documents, such a platform is
>> broken and shouldn't exist.
> 
> Is this a public document?
> Probably not but if, a pointer in this thread would help.
> Does Microsoft mention ACPI Time and Alarm Device interface in
> such a document already?
> 

This is the document... I can't remember who sent me the link to it:

http://goo.gl/R7S9Mk

	-hpa

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/