Re: [PATCH] scsi: integer overflow in megadev_ioctl()

[Levente Kurusa]

Hi,

On 12/13/2013 05:55 PM, Yu Chen wrote:
>  drivers/scsi/megaraid.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/megaraid.c b/drivers/scsi/megaraid.c
> index 816db12..41bbc21 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/megaraid.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/megaraid.c
> @@ -3113,7 +3113,8 @@ megadev_ioctl(struct file *filep, unsigned int
> cmd, unsigned long arg)
>   /*
>   * Which adapter
>   */
> - if( (adapno = GETADAP(uioc.adapno)) >= hba_count )
> +                adapno = GETADAP(uioc.adapno);
> + if( adapno >= hba_count || adapno < 0 )
>   return (-ENODEV);

Wouldn't returning -EINVAL be better? For hba_count I understand that
-ENODEV is returned but for adapno being a passed variable, I would
suggest returning -EINVAL.

-- 
Regards,
Levente Kurusa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/