Re: [PATCH 2/3] smack: call WARN_ONCE() instead of calling audit_log_start()

[Casey Schaufler]

On 12/4/2013 6:45 PM, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> Remove the call to audit_log() (which call audit_log_start()) and deal with
> the errors in the caller, logging only once if the condition is met.  Calling
> audit_log_start() in this location makes buffer allocation and locking more
> complicated in the calling tree (audit_filter_user()).
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@xxxxxxxxxx>

I'm not opposed to this change, but have you actually tried it?

> ---
>  security/smack/smack_lsm.c |    5 ++---
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
> index 8825375..185e2e7 100644
> --- a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
> +++ b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
> @@ -3615,9 +3615,8 @@ static int smack_audit_rule_match(u32 secid, u32 field, u32 op, void *vrule,
>  	struct smack_known *skp;
>  	char *rule = vrule;
>  
> -	if (!rule) {
> -		audit_log(actx, GFP_ATOMIC, AUDIT_SELINUX_ERR,
> -			  "Smack: missing rule\n");
> +	if (unlikely(!rule)) {
> +		WARN_ONCE(1, "Smack: missing rule\n");
>  		return -ENOENT;
>  	}
>  

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/