Re: [net-next PATCH 3/6] macvtap: remove the dead branch

[David Miller]

From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2013 22:08:20 -0800

> Assigning the function's return value to ret just to ignore it seems
> odd.
> 
> Might make sense to change the function type to void.

That's exactly what his very next patch does, undoubtedly the two
patches should be combined into one.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/