Re: [PATCH 1/2] rtc: rtc-twl: Use devm_*() functions

From: Jingoo Han
Date: Thu Dec 05 2013 - 20:49:13 EST


On Friday, December 06, 2013 1:51 AM, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> On 12/05/2013 03:03 AM, Jingoo Han wrote:
> > Use devm_*() functions to make cleanup paths simpler, and remove
> > unnecessary remove().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/rtc/rtc-twl.c | 38 +++++++++++++-------------------------
> > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-twl.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-twl.c
> > index c2e80d7..1915464 100644
> > --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-twl.c
> > +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-twl.c
> > @@ -479,7 +479,7 @@ static int twl_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > u8 rd_reg;
> >
> > if (irq <= 0)
> > - goto out1;
> > + return ret;
> >
> > /* Initialize the register map */
> > if (twl_class_is_4030())
> > @@ -489,7 +489,7 @@ static int twl_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >
> > ret = twl_rtc_read_u8(&rd_reg, REG_RTC_STATUS_REG);
> > if (ret < 0)
> > - goto out1;
> > + return ret;
> >
> > if (rd_reg & BIT_RTC_STATUS_REG_POWER_UP_M)
> > dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Power up reset detected.\n");
> > @@ -500,7 +500,7 @@ static int twl_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > /* Clear RTC Power up reset and pending alarm interrupts */
> > ret = twl_rtc_write_u8(rd_reg, REG_RTC_STATUS_REG);
> > if (ret < 0)
> > - goto out1;
> > + return ret;
> >
> > if (twl_class_is_6030()) {
> > twl6030_interrupt_unmask(TWL6030_RTC_INT_MASK,
> > @@ -512,7 +512,7 @@ static int twl_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Enabling TWL-RTC\n");
> > ret = twl_rtc_write_u8(BIT_RTC_CTRL_REG_STOP_RTC_M, REG_RTC_CTRL_REG);
> > if (ret < 0)
> > - goto out1;
> > + return ret;
> >
> > /* ensure interrupts are disabled, bootloaders can be strange */
> > ret = twl_rtc_write_u8(0, REG_RTC_INTERRUPTS_REG);
> > @@ -522,34 +522,29 @@ static int twl_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > /* init cached IRQ enable bits */
> > ret = twl_rtc_read_u8(&rtc_irq_bits, REG_RTC_INTERRUPTS_REG);
> > if (ret < 0)
> > - goto out1;
> > + return ret;
> >
> > device_init_wakeup(&pdev->dev, 1);
> >
> > - rtc = rtc_device_register(pdev->name,
> > - &pdev->dev, &twl_rtc_ops, THIS_MODULE);
> > + rtc = devm_rtc_device_register(&pdev->dev, pdev->name,
> > + &twl_rtc_ops, THIS_MODULE);
> > if (IS_ERR(rtc)) {
> > - ret = PTR_ERR(rtc);
> > dev_err(&pdev->dev, "can't register RTC device, err %ld\n",
> > PTR_ERR(rtc));
> > - goto out1;
> > + return PTR_ERR(rtc);
> > }
> >
> > - ret = request_threaded_irq(irq, NULL, twl_rtc_interrupt,
> > - IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING | IRQF_ONESHOT,
> > - dev_name(&rtc->dev), rtc);
> > + ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, NULL,
> > + twl_rtc_interrupt,
> > + IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING | IRQF_ONESHOT,
> > + dev_name(&rtc->dev), rtc);
>
> Looks like this will change driver release order and free_irq
> will be called after RTC device is unregistered.
> I think, you need to request irq first -> then register RTC device.
> Right?

Hi Grygorii Strashko,

No, free_irq() will be called before RTC device is unregistered.

In probe(), the following functions are called as below:
1. devm_rtc_device_register() -> rtc_device_register()
2. devm_request_threaded_irq() -> request_threaded_irq()

The release functions will be inversely called.
When removing rtc-twl.
1. devm_irq_release() -> free_irq()
2. devm_rtc_device_release() -> rtc_device_unregister()

Thus, it is safe.
Thank you for your feedback. :-)

Best regards,
Jingoo Han

>
> > if (ret < 0) {
> > dev_err(&pdev->dev, "IRQ is not free.\n");
> > - goto out2;
> > + return ret;
> > }
> >
> > platform_set_drvdata(pdev, rtc);
> > return 0;
> > -
> > -out2:
> > - rtc_device_unregister(rtc);
> > -out1:
> > - return ret;
> > }
> >
> > /*
> > @@ -559,9 +554,6 @@ out1:
> > static int twl_rtc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > {
> > /* leave rtc running, but disable irqs */
> > - struct rtc_device *rtc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > - int irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> > -
> > mask_rtc_irq_bit(BIT_RTC_INTERRUPTS_REG_IT_ALARM_M);
> > mask_rtc_irq_bit(BIT_RTC_INTERRUPTS_REG_IT_TIMER_M);
> > if (twl_class_is_6030()) {
> > @@ -571,10 +563,6 @@ static int twl_rtc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > REG_INT_MSK_STS_A);
> > }
> >
> > -
> > - free_irq(irq, rtc);
> > -
> > - rtc_device_unregister(rtc);
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> >

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/