Re: [PATCH 0/5] PM: Enable option of re-use runtime PM callbacksat system suspend

[Pavel Machek]

On Thu 2013-12-05 17:21:50, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Dec 2013, Len Brown wrote:
> 
> > This thread raises the question...
> > 
> > Do we still need to have PM_RUNTIME apart from PM_SLEEP?
> > 
> > What is the benefit of being able to build-in one one without the other?
> > If that benefit is not significant, perhaps the time has come to
> > replace them both with CONFIG_PM...
> 
> There are lots of embedded/SoC platforms that implement PM_RUNTIME but
> not PM_SLEEP.

And lots of PCs where PM_SLEEP is useful but PM_RUNTIME is not :-).
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/