Re: [PATCH v4 10/15] usb: phy: msm: Add device tree support andbinding information

From: Mark Rutland
Date: Thu Dec 05 2013 - 05:42:07 EST


On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 12:54:37PM +0000, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> On Fri, 2013-11-15 at 16:38 +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 02:51:45PM +0000, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:
> > > From: "Ivan T. Ivanov" <iivanov@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Allows MSM OTG controller to be specified via device tree.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ivan T. Ivanov <iivanov@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > ---
> > > .../devicetree/bindings/usb/msm-hsusb.txt | 57 +++++++++++++-
> > > drivers/usb/phy/phy-msm-usb.c | 79 +++++++++++++++++---
> > > 2 files changed, 124 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

[...]

> > > +
> > > +- dr_mode: One of "host", "peripheral" or "otg". Defaults to "otg"
> >
> > If this has a default and thus isn't required, it should be listed as
> > optional.
>
> This is part of the standard USB bindings, Perhaps I could just
> refer to: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/generic.txt

That would be fine, but it should also be moved to the optional
properties section.

>
>
> >
> > > +
> > > +- vdccx-supply: phandle to the regulator for the vdd supply for
> > > + digital circuit operation.
> > > +- v1p8-supply: phandle to the regulator for the 1.8V supply
> > > +- v3p3-supply: phandle to the regulator for the 3.3V supply
> > > +
> > > +- qcom,otg-control: OTG control (VBUS and ID notifications) can be one of
> > > + 1 - PHY control
> > > + 2 - PMIC control
> > > + 3 - User control (via debugfs)
> >
> > NAK. This does not seem like a description of the hardware, and given
> > the debugfs comment is fundamentally tied to the way Linux functions
> > today.
>
> I will remove option 3, but rest are really property of the chipset.

Can you elaborate on the diffence please?

>
> >
> > > +
> > > +Optional properties:
> > > +- qcom,phy-init-sequence: PHY configuration sequence. val, reg pairs
> > > + terminate with -1
> >
> > What is this? I'm really not keen on having arbitrary register/memory
> > poking sequences in the dt.
>
> This is related Device Mode Eye Diagram test and values used could be
> different between chipsets.

Ok. Then we should encode the tuning data rather than adding a mechanism
to allow for writes to arbitrary addresses.

>
> >
> > Why does it need to be terminated? Surely the size of the property tells
> > you that it's terminated.
>
> Yes. -1 termination could be done in driver.

Please do. There's no need for it to be in the DT.

Cheers,
Mark.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/