Re: [PATCH V3 1/6] cpufreq: suspend governors on system suspend/hibernate

[Viresh Kumar]

On 27 November 2013 07:12, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Anyway, if you did what I asked you to do and put the cpufreq suspend/resume
> into dpm_suspend/resume_noirq(), I'd probably take this for 3.13.  However,
> since you've decided to put those things somewhere else thus making the
> change much more intrusive, I can only queue it up for 3.14.
>
> This means I'm going to take the Tianyu's patch as a stop gap for 3.13.

There were design issues with that patch actually, as I pointed out earlier
(handling EXIT part in core and INIT in governors).. And so in case we
need to get something for v3.13, I will send a short version of this series
with callbacks from suspend_noirq.

Get that one instead.

--
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/