Re: [PATCH tty-next 5/7] n_tty: Refactor input_available_p() bycall site

From: One Thousand Gnomes
Date: Sun Nov 24 2013 - 11:19:40 EST


On Sat, 23 Nov 2013 21:01:56 -0500
Peter Hurley <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 11/23/2013 07:26 PM, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
> > On Fri, 22 Nov 2013 10:59:23 -0500
> > Peter Hurley <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> Distinguish if caller is n_tty_poll() or n_tty_read(), and
> >> set the read/wakeup threshold accordingly.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Peter Hurley <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Doh ignore previous.. yes that patch is right. I should pay attention to
> > 0/7 8)
>
> Maybe I should add more to the commit message from the cover letter
> description ?

Maybe I should just read the code more carefully 8).

Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/