Re: BUG: mm, numa: test segfaults, only when NUMA balancing is on

[Mel Gorman]

On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 03:28:07PM -0600, Alex Thorlton wrote:
> > If the warning added by that patch does *not* trigger than can you also
> > test this patch? It removes the barriers which should not be necessary
> > and takes a reference tot he page before waiting on the lock. The
> > previous version did not take the reference because otherwise the
> > WARN_ON could not distinguish between a migration waiter and a surprise
> > gup.
> 
> Sorry for the delay; been a bit busy.  I tested both of these patches on
> top of this one (separately, of course):
> 
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mm/msg63919.html
> 
> I think that's the one you were referring to, if not send me a pointer
> to the correct one and I'll give it another shot.  Both patches still
> segfaulted, so it doesn't appear that either of these solved the
> problem. 

I see. Does THP have to be enabled or does it segfault even with THP
disabled?

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/