Re: /proc/vmcore mmap() failure issue

From: Vivek Goyal
Date: Thu Nov 21 2013 - 11:53:12 EST


On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 05:31:46PM +0900, HATAYAMA Daisuke wrote:

[..]
> > So I think the patch I sent is enough, the policy will be simpler as
> > "Don't use mmap() for buggy kernels".
> >
> > [PATCH] Fall back to read() when mmap() fails.
> > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/kexec/2013-November/010199.html
> >
>
> I think logic becomes not so complex. For example, if input vmcore
> format is ELF, then:
>
> o in update_mmap_range():
> - first calculate a range of the corresponding PT_LOAD entry truncated with
> PAGE_SIZE.
> - Then, truncate range of mmap() by the truncated range of the corresponding
> PT_LOAD entry, i.e., exlucde partial pages from mmap() target range.
> - Then determine offsets of two partial pages; the number of partial pages
> are always at most two. The offsets can easily be calculated from the
> original range of the corresponding PT_LOAD entry
>
> o in read_from_vmcore(), if a given offset belongs to either of two partial
> pages, then go to read() path; if not, go to mmap() path.

I agree that we should do mmap() on all non-partial pages and do read()
on all partial pages. Otherwise we lose the benefit of faster speed of
mmap().

Thanks
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/