On 17:31 Wed 20 Nov , boris brezillon wrote:On 20/11/2013 16:02, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:load the partial dts via userspaceOn 14:37 Wed 28 Aug , Boris BREZILLON wrote:Add a new at91rm9200ek_mmc board (based on at91rm9200ek board) which enablesno for multiple dts
mmc0/slot0.
this need to handle at user space level
You mean, by controlling the regulator using the sysfs interface, or
by loading
only the appropriate driver ?
What if both drivers are loaded (or not compiled as modules) ?this will never be the case
This will lead to one device being unusable (and maybe even worst)...
Best Regards,
J.
Please explain what you had in mind ?
Best Regards,
J.
Signed-off-by: Boris BREZILLON <b.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/at91rm9200ek_mmc.dts | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/at91rm9200ek_mmc.dts
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91rm9200ek_mmc.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91rm9200ek_mmc.dts
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c87a861
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91rm9200ek_mmc.dts
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+/*
+ * at91rm9200ek.dts - Device Tree file for Atmel AT91RM9200 evaluation kit with
+ * an MMC slot
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2013 Boris BREZILLON <b.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
+ *
+ * Licensed under GPLv2 only
+ */
+/dts-v1/;
+#include "at91rm9200ek.dts"
+
+/ {
+ model = "Atmel AT91RM9200 evaluation kit with MMC slot";
+ compatible = "atmel,at91rm9200ek-mmc", "atmel,at91rm9200ek", "atmel,at91rm9200";
+
+ ahb {
+ apb {
+ mmc0: mmc@fffb4000 {
+ status = "okay";
+ };
+ };
+ };
+};
--
1.7.9.5