Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: Use a sane boot frequency whenbooting with a mismatched bootloader configuration

[Viresh Kumar]

On 20 November 2013 20:29, Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx> wrote:
> With the current governors that we have in upstream, the only one of
> my concern has been userspace governor, but based on your comment
> earlier in the thread, this is considered an non-issue since userspace
> must trigger transition. However, this does put the SoC at risk
> depending on distro and custom governors used.
>
> If the opinion is that we dont care about these, well.. I can end my
> complaints and depend on the stats to tell me if an unknown frequency
> was ever attempted for debug (even though I might personally not be
> too excited about it).

I wouldn't say that I was against this patch, but it looked like we could live
without it as well.. But I also feel that there is some amount of uncertainty
here and specially with userspace governor..

So, just see the patch which I have floated as replacement for few of the
patches we have been talking about..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/