On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 11:57 -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:On 11/19/2013 11:53 AM, Joe Perches wrote:On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 11:46 -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:Oops. I did compile. Missed the warning. Sorry about that.Replaced printks with dev_* and pr_* routines. Replacing printk in[]
__suspend_report_result() will require passing in struct device *
pointer from calling routines and this will require changes to
external interface suspend_report_result() which is used by several
drivers. Hence, this one instance is replaced by pr_err().
diff --git a/drivers/base/power/main.c b/drivers/base/power/main.c[]@@ -1308,9 +1308,8 @@ int dpm_prepare(pm_message_t state)
error = 0;
continue;
}
- printk(KERN_INFO "PM: Device %s not prepared "
- "for power transition: code %d\n",
- dev_name(dev), error);
+ dev_info("PM: not prepared for power transition: ",
+ "code %d\n", error);
Shuah, you have to make sure the files modified by
your patches compile successfully before sending
patches like this.
btw:
When you're doing patches like this, not bugfixes,
not something that's going to be applied to current
or stable, please make them against -next and not
against Linus' tree.
Also, I would make the larger change that modifies
all the drivers like I suggested. What you've done
I think is a half-measure and is incomplete.