[PATCH 4/4] PM / devfreq: Consider hibernation in pm notifier

From: Jonghwan Choi
Date: Tue Nov 19 2013 - 08:30:46 EST


Frequency lock should be considered in suspend/hibernation.

Signed-off-by: Jonghwan Choi <jhbird.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/devfreq/exynos/exynos5_bus.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/exynos/exynos5_bus.c b/drivers/devfreq/exynos/exynos5_bus.c
index a60da3c..bd672de0 100644
--- a/drivers/devfreq/exynos/exynos5_bus.c
+++ b/drivers/devfreq/exynos/exynos5_bus.c
@@ -268,6 +268,7 @@ static int exynos5_busfreq_int_pm_notifier_event(struct notifier_block *this,
int err = 0;

switch (event) {
+ case PM_HIBERNATION_PREPARE:
case PM_SUSPEND_PREPARE:
/* Set Fastest and Deactivate DVFS */
mutex_lock(&data->lock);
@@ -300,6 +301,7 @@ unlock:
if (err)
return NOTIFY_BAD;
return NOTIFY_OK;
+ case PM_POST_HIBERNATION:
case PM_POST_RESTORE:
case PM_POST_SUSPEND:
/* Reactivate */
--
1.8.1.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/