Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: suspend/resume governors with PM notifiers

[Viresh Kumar]

On 18 November 2013 16:27, Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> How about introducing a resume/suspend callback pointer or list(if there
> are several places that need to deal with cpu resume/suspend) in the
> struct cpu and populate it in the cpufreq_add_dev()?
>
> The suspend/resume() of cpu_subsys needs to check the callback pointer
> and run it if available.

That's almost a new infrastructure then and looks more hackish :)
Apart from that even cpufreq would be a bit hacky as we don't really need
per-cpu callbacks..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/