Re: [Intel-gfx] kernel 3.11.6 general protection fault

[Borislav Petkov]

On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 05:45:18PM +0100, MPhil. Emanoil Kotsev wrote:
> How - new libraries - more exhaustive algorythms - higher cpu usage
> etc. Some of the things M$ is doing on purpose to force you upgrade
> your hardware every 2-3years

That would be too easy and machines would be dying left and right of
overheating. Actually, sane hardware is much more robust than that and
it throttles itself in case of critical temperature levels. And, IMHO
your Dell Latitude D520 should be fine, in that respect. But we'll see.
:-)

> I wanted to first compile the kernel with the debug option you
> mentioned, but while compiling it went to about 75ÂC.

Yeah, that's still ok if we trust the output saying that 126ÂC is the
critical temp.

It would be interesting to see what this sensor says right before the
machine locks up.

HTH.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/