Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Add request_firmware_direct() for microcode loader

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 04:34:09PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Tue, 12 Nov 2013 13:02:12 +0100,
> Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > this is a revised patch series to introduce request_firmware_direct()
> > helper for avoiding the lengthy udev issue on microcode loader.
> > The original problem was stated in Prarit's post:
> >    https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/10/28/221
> > 
> > In short, microcode loader probes non-existing firmware files (which
> > are cases with every new chip), and each probe takes 60 seconds,
> > resulting in too long time until completed.
> > 
> > This solution is simply avoiding the udev fallback in
> > request_firmware() explicitly for drivers like microcode.
> > 
> > Of course, this doesn't mean to throw away further optimizations like
> > Prarit's patch.  It can be implemented in parallel with this.
> > 
> > 
> >  [PATCH v3 1/4] firmware: Introduce request_firmware_direct()
> >  [PATCH v3 2/4] microcode: Use request_firmware_direct()
> >  [PATCH v3 3/4] firmware: Use bit flags instead of boolean combos
> >  [PATCH v3 4/4] firmware: Suppress fallback warnings when CONFIG_FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER=n
> > 
> > v1->v2: Rebased on linux-next, add a fix for a bogus warning message
> > v2->v3: Convert to bit flags, fix warning message differently
> > 
> > 
> > Greg, could you take these patches through your driver tree, as
> > most of fixes are about the firmware loader itself.
> 
> Greg, any chance to take a look at these patches?

I'm traveling at the moment, in Korea this week.  I'll take a look at
them after 3.13-rc1 is out, as I can't do anything with patches until
then.  Don't worry, they aren't lost.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/