Re: [PATCH 10/10] perf record: Add an option to force per-cpu mmaps

From: Adrian Hunter
Date: Fri Nov 15 2013 - 06:20:44 EST


On 15/11/13 13:10, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>> And I also raised why this shouldn't be the default event tracing
>>> method instead of a weird config option. Per-cpu tracing is cache
>>> compact, it is easier to size properly and in general it is pretty
>>> easy to think about. (It also has less of the TSC timestamp
>>> ordering problems as per thread tracing, at least in theory.)
>>>
>>> Is there something that makes per cpu tracing undesirable as the
>>> default?
>>
>> One reason is to avoid changing the meaning of existing options.
>
> Well, the way the tracing buffers are set up is a mostly tool internal
> matter so in that sense it should be just fine to change the default
> behavior - as long as output remains unchanged (which it should).
>
> Or is there any material change in behavior somewhere?

Inheritance is enabled automatically with per-cpu mmaps,
although that is one of the reasons people want
per-cpu mmaps.

>
>> To flip it around, ignore the patches above and apply:
>
>> Subject: [PATCH] perf record: Make per-cpu mmaps the default.
>
> Yay!
>
>> +--per-thread::
>> +Use per-thread mmaps. By default per-cpu mmaps are created. This option
>> +overrides that and uses per-thread mmaps. A side-effect of that is that
>> +inheritance is automatically disabled. --per-thread is ignored with a warning
>> +if combined with -a or -C options.
>
> I think this is the natural thing to do, --per-thread is the 'somewhat
> weird' option that cannot be used in all modes.
>
> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> :-)
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ingo
>
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/