Re: [PATCH 10/10] perf tests: Use lower sample_freq in sw clock event period test

[Namhyung Kim]

Hi Arnaldo,

On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 11:41:01 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 09:07:36AM +0200, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
>> -#define NR_LOOPS  1000000
>> +#define NR_LOOPS  10000000
>
> Lower frequency, need to generate more noise, ugh. Adding that, but I
> think this test needs to be reworked, Namhyung?

Hmm.. We might go back to use the default frequency of 4000 (or 1000)
and make the loop based on time like using alarm or setitimer.

Or we can add an outer loop which doubles the inner loop counter if no
samples are collected.

What do you think?

Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/