Re: linux-next: manual merge of the random tree with the net-next tree

[Hannes Frederic Sowa]

On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 06:02:42PM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 09:55:29AM +0100, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> > 
> > As per Hannes' suggestion, the result should look like (see cover
> > letter in [1]):
> > 
> > if (r->entropy_total > 128) {
> > 	r->initialized = 1;
> > 	r->entropy_total = 0;
> > 	if (r == &nonblocking_pool) {
> > 		prandom_reseed_late();
> > 		pr_notice("random: %s pool is initialized\n",
> > 			  r->name);
> > 	}
> > }
> 
> Agreed.  What's the schedule for pushing net-dev to Linus?  I'm
> currently at Korea Linux Forum, and I was originally planning on
> pushing random.git to Linus sometime today, but I'm also willing to
> wait for net-dev to go first.  Either way, we should make sure Linus
> is aware of the agreed-upon resolution of the merge conflict.

net-next is already on its way: http://markmail.org/message/ihccweynhtpdd66u

Greetings,

  Hannes

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/