Re: [GIT PULL] clockevents/clocksource: 3.12 fixes

From: Daniel Lezcano
Date: Tue Nov 12 2013 - 13:48:10 EST


On 11/12/2013 07:35 PM, Uwe Kleine-KÃnig wrote:
Hello,

On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 03:01:29PM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:

Hi Ingo and Thomas,

this pull request has the following contain:

* Laurent Pinchard fixed a missing a clk_put in case the
registering of the sh_mtu[2] drivers fails.

* Uwe Kleine-KÃnig reuse clockevents_config_and_register for the
at91rm9200_time timer as it was depending on the patch (commit
a4578ea (clockevents: Sanitize ticks to nsec conversion).

I don't know why Thomas's patch "clockevents: Sanitize ticks to nsec
conversion" appears in the request log because it is not part of the
patches interval I specified for git request pull. The diffstat does
not show the files which should have been changed by the patch. In
any case I kept the changelog untouched since it is what gives me
git and maybe someone can tell me why it appears.
Look at:

git log --oneline --graph --boundary 97b9410..42ab380

Then you see that there is Thomas' patch twice. Once the version he
committed and sent to Linus (97b9410) and once the version that you get
as part of my pull request (a4578ea). To fix this (assuming you don't
care much about a stable tree), simply do:

git rebase 97b9410 42ab380

and let the result pull.

Ah, yeah, I was suspecting something like that. Thanks a lot for the clarification.

-- Daniel


--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org â Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/