Re: [RFC][PATCH v5 00/14] sched: packing tasks

[Arjan van de Ven]

On 11/11/2013 10:18 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> The ordering is based on the actual C-state, so a simple way is to wake
> up the CPU in the shallowest C-state. With asymmetric configurations
> (big.LITTLE) we have different costs for the same C-state, so this would
> come in handy.

btw I was considering something else; in practice CPUs will be in the deepest state..
... at which point I was going to go with some other metrics of what is best from a platform level

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/