Re: [PATCH 2/3] panic: improve panic_timeout calculation

[Theodore Ts'o]

On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 02:52:16PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > That's exactly what I did. Addressing feedback constructively doesn't 
> > mean do exactly what you say without arguing.
> 
> Your reply to my routine feedback was obtuse, argumentative and needlessly 
> confrontative - that's not 'constructive'.

Felipe, remember when on the Git list Junio said he would stop trying
to respond to any patches that had problems because you couldn't
respond constructively to feedback, and you claimed that you had no
problems working with other folks, including on the Linux Kernel
mailing list?

You might want to take this feedback and consider whether the problem
may be with *you*, and your user interface, and not with other folks
like Ingo and Junio.  You clearly want to contribute to both projects,
and we can always use more skilled hackers.  But part of being a good
hacker is being able to play well with others.

Best regards,

					- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/