Re: [PATCHv2] net: wireless: iwlwifi: remove minor dead code

[Johannes Berg]

On Sun, 2013-11-10 at 21:17 +0100, Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
> inta is checked to be zero in a IRQ_NONE branch so afterwards it
> cannot be zero as it is never modified.

no signed-off-by


> @@ -1150,7 +1149,14 @@ static irqreturn_t iwl_pcie_isr(int irq, void *data)
>  	 * or due to sporadic interrupts thrown from our NIC. */
>  	if (!inta) {
>  		IWL_DEBUG_ISR(trans, "Ignore interrupt, inta == 0\n");
> -		goto none;
> +		/* re-enable interrupts here since we don't have anything to
> +		 * service.  only Re-enable if disabled by irq and no
> +		 * schedules tasklet.
> +		 */
> +		if (test_bit(STATUS_INT_ENABLED, &trans_pcie->status) &&
> +		    !trans_pcie->inta)
> +			iwl_enable_interrupts(trans);
> +		return IRQ_NONE;

I don't really think duplicating this is really an improvement?

johannes

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/