Re: [PATCH v10] Staging: zram: Fix memory leak by refcount mismatch

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 07:36:09PM +0530, Rashika Kheria wrote:
> As suggested by Minchan Kim and Jerome Marchand "The code in reset_store
> get the block device (bdget_disk()) but it does not put it (bdput()) when
> it's done using it. The usage count is therefore incremented but never
> decremented."
> 
> This patch also puts bdput() for all error cases.
> 
> Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: Rashika Kheria <rashika.kheria@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> 
> This revision fixes the following issue of the previous revision-
> Incorrect Subject Line

I'm a bit confused now, I see three different zram patches from you,
with different subjects, are they all now just in one patch, this one?

Can you just send me the outstanding zram patches that you have gotten
acks from that you want applied, as I'm lost here.

thanks,

greg "easily confused" k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/