[PATCH 3.11 42/94] md: Fix skipping recovery for read-only arrays.

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

3.11-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Lukasz Dorau <lukasz.dorau@xxxxxxxxx>

commit 61e4947c99c4494336254ec540c50186d186150b upstream.

Since:
        commit 7ceb17e87bde79d285a8b988cfed9eaeebe60b86
        md: Allow devices to be re-added to a read-only array.

spares are activated on a read-only array. In case of raid1 and raid10
personalities it causes that not-in-sync devices are marked in-sync
without checking if recovery has been finished.

If a read-only array is degraded and one of its devices is not in-sync
(because the array has been only partially recovered) recovery will be skipped.

This patch adds checking if recovery has been finished before marking a device
in-sync for raid1 and raid10 personalities. In case of raid5 personality
such condition is already present (at raid5.c:6029).

Bug was introduced in 3.10 and causes data corruption.

Signed-off-by: Pawel Baldysiak <pawel.baldysiak@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Lukasz Dorau <lukasz.dorau@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
 drivers/md/raid1.c  |    1 +
 drivers/md/raid10.c |    1 +
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)

--- a/drivers/md/raid1.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid1.c
@@ -1479,6 +1479,7 @@ static int raid1_spare_active(struct mdd
 			}
 		}
 		if (rdev
+		    && rdev->recovery_offset == MaxSector
 		    && !test_bit(Faulty, &rdev->flags)
 		    && !test_and_set_bit(In_sync, &rdev->flags)) {
 			count++;
--- a/drivers/md/raid10.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid10.c
@@ -1782,6 +1782,7 @@ static int raid10_spare_active(struct md
 			}
 			sysfs_notify_dirent_safe(tmp->replacement->sysfs_state);
 		} else if (tmp->rdev
+			   && tmp->rdev->recovery_offset == MaxSector
 			   && !test_bit(Faulty, &tmp->rdev->flags)
 			   && !test_and_set_bit(In_sync, &tmp->rdev->flags)) {
 			count++;


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/