Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] MCS Lock: optimizations and extra comments

From: Tim Chen
Date: Wed Nov 06 2013 - 16:47:40 EST


On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 13:37 -0800, Tim Chen wrote:
> Remove unnecessary operation and make the cmpxchg(lock, node, NULL) == node
> check in mcs_spin_unlock() likely() as it is likely that a race did not occur
> most of the time.
>
> Also add in more comments describing how the local node is used in MCS locks.
>
> Reviewed-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Low <jason.low2@xxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Should be Acked-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>.
My fat fingers accidentally added my signed off for all patches.

Tim

> ---
> include/linux/mcs_spinlock.h | 13 +++++++++++--
> 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mcs_spinlock.h b/include/linux/mcs_spinlock.h
> index b5de3b0..96f14299 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mcs_spinlock.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mcs_spinlock.h
> @@ -18,6 +18,12 @@ struct mcs_spinlock {
> };
>
> /*
> + * In order to acquire the lock, the caller should declare a local node and
> + * pass a reference of the node to this function in addition to the lock.
> + * If the lock has already been acquired, then this will proceed to spin
> + * on this node->locked until the previous lock holder sets the node->locked
> + * in mcs_spin_unlock().
> + *
> * We don't inline mcs_spin_lock() so that perf can correctly account for the
> * time spent in this lock function.
> */
> @@ -33,7 +39,6 @@ void mcs_spin_lock(struct mcs_spinlock **lock, struct mcs_spinlock *node)
> prev = xchg(lock, node);
> if (likely(prev == NULL)) {
> /* Lock acquired */
> - node->locked = 1;
> return;
> }
> ACCESS_ONCE(prev->next) = node;
> @@ -43,6 +48,10 @@ void mcs_spin_lock(struct mcs_spinlock **lock, struct mcs_spinlock *node)
> arch_mutex_cpu_relax();
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Releases the lock. The caller should pass in the corresponding node that
> + * was used to acquire the lock.
> + */
> static void mcs_spin_unlock(struct mcs_spinlock **lock, struct mcs_spinlock *node)
> {
> struct mcs_spinlock *next = ACCESS_ONCE(node->next);
> @@ -51,7 +60,7 @@ static void mcs_spin_unlock(struct mcs_spinlock **lock, struct mcs_spinlock *nod
> /*
> * Release the lock by setting it to NULL
> */
> - if (cmpxchg(lock, node, NULL) == node)
> + if (likely(cmpxchg(lock, node, NULL) == node))
> return;
> /* Wait until the next pointer is set */
> while (!(next = ACCESS_ONCE(node->next)))


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/