Re: [libseccomp-discuss] ARM audit, seccomp, etc are broken wrtOABI syscalls

[Russell King - ARM Linux]

On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 10:32:31AM -0500, Eric Paris wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-11-05 at 14:36 -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > 1. Set a different audit arch for OABI syscalls (e.g.
> > AUDIT_ARCH_ARMOABI).  That is, treat OABI syscall entries the same way
> > that x86_64 treats int 80.
> 
> As the audit maintainer, I like #1.  It might break ABI, but the ABI is
> flat wrong now and not maintainable...

If you read the whole thread, you will see that this corner case is just
not worth the effort to support.  Audit may as well be disabled by
kernel config if any OABI support is enabled.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/