Re: [PATCH 2/8] trace/trace_stat: use rbtree postorder iterationhelper instead of opencoding

[Steven Rostedt]

On Mon, 04 Nov 2013 00:49:21 -0800
Cody P Schafer <cody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 11/01/2013 07:45 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Fri,  1 Nov 2013 15:38:46 -0700
> > Cody P Schafer <cody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> Use rbtree_postorder_for_each_entry_safe() to destroy the rbtree instead
> >> of opencoding an alternate postorder iteration that modifies the tree
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Cody P Schafer <cody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >>   kernel/trace/trace_stat.c | 42 ++++++------------------------------------
> >>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
> >>
> 
> >> +	rbtree_postorder_for_each_entry_safe(snode, n, &session->stat_root,
> >> +			node) {
> >
> > This is one of those cases that a line break is uglier than keeping it
> > on the same line. Heck, it's only 4 characters over the 80 char limit.
> >
> 
> I'm fine with that being tweaked.
> 
> > Other than that, I'm fine with this patch. Want me to take this
> > separately?
> >
> 
> The patches in this patchset are all independent (they just happen to be 
> making nearly identical changes throughout the tree), so feel free.
> 

OK, I'll pull it in and modify the above change too.

Thanks,

-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/