Re: [PATCH v3] omapdss: Add new panel driver for Topolly td028ttec1LCD.

From: Tomi Valkeinen
Date: Thu Oct 31 2013 - 06:32:22 EST


On 2013-10-30 00:25, Marek Belisko wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Marek Belisko <marek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> changes from v2:
> - move tx_buf from driver data to functions where it's used
> - update write functions names (to reflect how many bytes are transferred)
> - update delays from 1s to 1ms (probably typo)
> - remove unnecessary 90ms sleep (tested and works fine)
> - disable dpi output after disable panel
>
> changes from v1:
> - reworked to be spi driver instead platform with custom spi bitbang
> this configuration was tested with spi_gpio bitbang driver on gta04 board
> and works fine (thanks Tomi and Lars-Peter for comments)
> - address previous comments
>
> drivers/video/omap2/displays-new/Kconfig | 6 +
> drivers/video/omap2/displays-new/Makefile | 1 +
> .../omap2/displays-new/panel-tpo-td028ttec1.c | 480 +++++++++++++++++++++
> include/video/omap-panel-data.h | 13 +
> 4 files changed, 500 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/video/omap2/displays-new/panel-tpo-td028ttec1.c

Sparse gave these warnings:

drivers/video/omap2/displays-new/panel-tpo-td028ttec1.c:67:5: warning:
symbol 'jbt_ret_write_0' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/video/omap2/displays-new/panel-tpo-td028ttec1.c:81:5: warning:
symbol 'jbt_reg_write_1' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/video/omap2/displays-new/panel-tpo-td028ttec1.c:97:5: warning:
symbol 'jbt_reg_write_2' was not declared. Should it be static?

I fixed them and queued the patch for 3.13.

Tomi


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature