[Question] : tie a task to a cluster when it shares memory resources
From: Daniel Lezcano
Date: Tue Oct 29 2013 - 13:32:39 EST
I am not expert on the NUMA area and the scheduler but I was wondering
On numa a process can define a memory policy to optimize access because
remote memory access is suboptimal.
On a multicluster (aka multipackage), eg. Bi-Xeon 4 cores, the scheduler
load balancing can spawn/balance a task to the second cluster even if
the task is resulting from a fork or a pthread_create. If I am correct
that could impact the performances due to L2 cache misses, no ?
Won't it be more efficient to tie a task to a cluster when it shares
memory resources with another task on the same cluster ? and when the
task does 'exec', this constraint is removed.
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org â Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/