Re: State of "perf: Add a new sort order: SORT_INCLUSIVE"

[Arun Sharma]

On 10/28/13 8:11 PM, Namhyung Kim wrote:

Hey Namhyung:

> > Also, what's the reasoning for --cumulate not being an option under
> > perf record -g ..,<order>?
>
> Sorry, I cannot understand you.  The 'perf record' just saves sample
> data (and callchains) from the ring-buffer.  All the processing happens
> in 'perf report'.  I can't see what you expect from the 'perf record
> --cumulate'.  Am I missing something?

Yes - I meant to say perf report -g :)

> -g [type,min[,limit],order]

Specifically, along with callee, caller, we could have a third option. 
Or we could have a new type (graph, fractal, cumulative).

> > Given that there are clear use cases in production involving complex
> > callgraphs, I'm for getting this support in first and then reconciling
> > the differences with perf record -b later.
>
> I think what Frederic said is that the code de-duplication of 'perf
> report' side.  The branch stack and --cumulate are different - branch
> stack concentrates on the branch itself but --cumulate uses callchains
> to find parents and give some credit to them as side information.

Me too. I brought it up with Stephane at some point in the last year or 
so and there wasn't an obvious way to de-duplicate because of these 
differences.

 -Arun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/